Everyone sells you where the risk is. Nørn tells you what to do about it, by when, and what it costs to be wrong.
A brighter light only moves where you can see in the light — and if somebody knows you are looking, they hide better. Nørn is a different sense. It reads a record for what the record does not say, puts a probability on each finding, and is scored when the date arrives.
Access is invitation-only today. We reply within two business days.
What you see
Three sights, in the order they get used. Each one was in the record all along and nobody had read it, because reading it means reasoning about an absence rather than looking up a row.
Who is there
They leave traces even when nobody files them — in what they supply, in what the parties around them hold, in the shape of what is missing. Nørn estimates the population behind an operation, names the candidates, and says which are observed and which are inferred, on every row.
In the federal record, one company holds work under forty separate names. Look it up by name and you find half of it.
How they have behaved, and how they will
Behavior is not a rating bought from somebody else. It is each party’s own record — how often it has held a date, on work of this size, in this part of the field — carried forward into a probability with the interval printed beside it. When the date arrives, the call is scored against what happened.
Of the federal awards that slipped, 89% were re-dated only after the promised date had already passed.
What you did not know you had
What you already hold is not working at its limit. Nørn names the parties with room and the qualification to take the work, and the alternatives nobody has called — options already bought, rather than something to go and find.
The other two sights are taken in service of this one. It is also the one nobody else attempts.
Where it is pointed today
It is the hardest version of the problem and the record is public, so the work is checkable by anyone holding the same sources. In that record, six dollars in every ten name nobody beneath the prime — $933.8B of open obligation with no supplier under it.
On Columbia-class, two propulsion awards set the finish in 71% of runs. Holding them to their dates brings the finish in by 1,224 days. Behind the two shipbuilders’ filings 261 firms are named; Nørn estimates about 684 are doing the work, and 117 of the named hold no prime award anywhere.
Both of those awards run through an agent directed by Naval Reactors, so the finding names who sets the date — a lever a program executive cannot pull is not a lever. The same reasoning has been run on B-21 and Minuteman III, and the sustainment view names a different critical path from the acquisition view.
Starting
Most tools in this market begin with an integration. Nørn begins with the public record, which it already holds. What you give it afterwards raises the fidelity — it does not unlock the product.
Day one · nothing from you
A risk-adjusted schedule read of your program built entirely from public contract actions. It supports your program office’s own view rather than arguing with it.
With your schedule
An integrated master schedule sharpens the critical path from inferred to reconciled — where your plan and the record disagree, and which one has been right before.
With your bill of materials
A bill of materials resolves the supplier question to the part and the part family, which is what separates a genuine single source from a name collision.
Browser access needs no ATO. If program data ever does come across, there are three routes — an isolated box, a pipe where raw data never leaves your servers, or plain upload.
Limits
The limits are part of the product. A tool that cannot say where its sight ends cannot be trusted where it can see.
Access
Fifteen minutes, live, on the public record — no data from you, no integration, no preparation. If it finds nothing, you have lost a quarter of an hour.
Tell us what you are trying to hold to its date. The figures behind all of this — the corpus, the scoring record, the limits of each measurement, and how program data would be handled — go out as a pack, with a date on it and a person to ask.